Selten wurde eine Op-Technik so von der Industrie „gepushed“ und von ChirurgInnen für PR-Zwecke missbraucht, ohne dass ihr Vorteil je bewiesen wurde. Das sollte zu denken geben!
Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Lee WK, Baek JH, Lee TH.
Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec 13
Luna RA, Nogueira DB, Varela PS, de O Rodrigues Neto E, Norton MJ, do Carmo B Ribeiro L, Peixoto AM, de Mendonça YL, Bendet I, Fiorelli RA, Dolan JP.
A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec 12
Saad S, Strassel V, Sauerland S.
Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Br J Surg. 2012 Nov 27
Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias AC.
Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct 6
Sasaki A, Ogawa M, Tono C, Obara S, Hosoi N, Wakabayashi G.
Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Oct;22(5):396-9
Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2729-34
Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S.
Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Ann Surg. 2011 Jul;254(1):22-7